TGO on Demand: Column Archive | Blog | The Author | Facts & FAQs | Email

 

 In Dissent Classics: "On the French Invasion" | Friday, 22 August 2003 | 688 words | Print

 
 

Read some of these recent columns, and then we'll kiss.

"The Oil No-Brainer" (20 June 2008; 633 words)

"Bill Clinton, Vanity Fair, and Old News" (05 June 2008; 620 words)

"Back Alley Conservatism" (29 May 2008; 656 words)

"Campaign '08: Never More Embarrassing?" (29 April 2008; 610 words)

"Ben Stein's Important Movie, Falling Short" (24 April 2008; 604 words)

"Tibet: This Year's Fashionable Victim" (10 April 2008; 609 words)

"(Jeremiah) Wright Reasoning" (22 March 2008; 701 words)

 

From the Beating a Dead Horse Department: The Unabrian Manifesto is likely to be the last book Brian Wise ever releases, given his acute laziness and pronounced lack of good ideas.  And it's free.  So give it a read, and on the day he finally drops off the deep end you'll be able to say, "Hey, I read that idiot's last book!"

 

RECENT READING.

                                                             

Editorial Note: Columbia having freed Ingrid Betancourt gives occasion for a repost of this column, which is also featured in The Unabrian Manifesto.

Odds are you don’t know of, or are only passively familiar with, John Gibson, host of the Fox News Channel’s The Big Story.  The show occupies the 5pm to 6pm Eastern time slot; while most of the United States is either at work or headed home from work, Gibson is hosting and, at the conclusion of each show, running some of the best smack on cable television.  Take this example from last Monday, 18 August: “Let’s play a guessing game.  Guess which country recently sent a secret military mission to Brazil and Columbia, without telling either country it was about to – well – launch a small invasion?”

What’s this?!  “This country also didn’t ask the UN Security Council for permission to conduct a military operation in Brazil and Columbia.  It just went ahead on its own, in defiance of international law.  This country also botched the whole operation so badly that the newspapers at home called it ‘The Bungle in the Jungle.’”  Okay, who was it?  “It was those cheese-eating surrender monkeys, the French – the very same people who have trashed America for going on a year now, saying our war in Iraq was illegal and illegitimate because we didn’t have UN approval.”  (“Cheese-eating surrender monkeys,” by the way, is quite possibly the greatest descriptive term in the history of the English language, first spoken about French language students on The Simpsons and later made popular in conservative circles by National Review’s Jonah Goldberg.)

For those who equate anti-Americanism and anti-Semitism with good policy, and who therefore take the United Nations seriously when it comes to international affairs, this should be of no small interest.  Last month, four French men offered a Brazilian bush pilot named Cleilton de Abreu £3,500 to fly them from Manaus to an airstrip near Columbia’s border.  “What de Abreu could never have guessed,” explains the UK’s Telegraph, “… was that he was carrying French secret service agents and a high-ranking government official.”  For what?  “They were the advance unit of an extraordinary mission to rescue [Columbian politician] Ingrid Betancourt … who was kidnapped by Marxist guerrillas of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Columbia [a.k.a. Farc] … while campaigning as a candidate in a presidential election 17 months ago.”

Betancourt has no real modern connections to France, other than she has a French passport as “a result of her first marriage to a diplomat,” and that her family considers French Prime Minister Dominique de Villepan, who taught Betancourt political science in Paris 20 years ago, a “close friend.”  (Her autobiography was also a French bestseller, in the parallel universe where that means something.)

As you might have imagined, things didn’t go as planned and the whole operation failed miserably.  “France stands accused of secretly negotiating with one of the world’s most dangerous terrorist organizations behind the backs of the governments of Brazil and Columbia, both of which insist they were never informed about the proposed mission…. Despite vigorous denials, the suspicion remains that a deal with Farc to exchange Betancourt for arms and / or millions of dollars had been on the table.”  (What?!  Arms for hostages?!  Someone get Lawrence Walsh on the phone!   The emphasis was added to reflect the Iran-Contra feel, for those Democrats who may have otherwise failed to make the connection.)

Subsequent denials fell apart under scrutiny and de Villepan was finally forced to apologize to Celso Amorim (his Brazilian counterpart), who accepted the apology, but who apparently didn’t speak for the diplomat who suggested Brazil expel French diplomats, saying France “would do better not to treat us like one of their African colonies.”  (Ouch, babe.)

Just so the criteria is well established for future military debate: Authors of Franco-bestsellers / Brazilian politicians are worth unsanctioned invasions and negotiations with terrorist organizations so long as someone in your administration taught them at university.  However, bringing to an abrupt end a toilet dictatorship responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people, which had WMD programs, which invaded Kuwait on its own accord without UN approval and which ignored 17 UN resolutions is absolutely out of the question.  Well, all right.

 

 
 

All Rights Reserved 2002 - 2008, Brian S. Wise.  BrianWise.com is part of the No Bridge Unburned Network.  Lapsus Calumni ...